Judicial Discipline, Judicial Independence, and the Constitution: a Textual and Structural Analysis

نویسنده

  • MARTIN H. REDISH
چکیده

Both the American Revolution and the nation which grew out of it adopted as their guiding political philosophy the principles of representationalism and accountability: Decisions of governing political and social policy are to be made, for the most part, by those who are both representative of and accountable to the populace.1 To be sure, those who framed our Constitution never contemplated either a direct or unlimited form of democracy. To the contrary, they inserted numerous republican-like speed bumps to democratic rule.2 The fact remains, however, that ultimate ac-

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Cognitive Criteria for the Moral Solution of the False Brothers “Independence” and “Despotism” of Judges Based on Religious Sources

The independence of judges in arbitration is an important process that is mentioned in the one hundred and fifty-sixth article of the Constitution. The main issue of this research is the moral solution of the false brothers of independence and despotism in judgment. Judges sometimes become confused between the two when making decisions and sentencing, which can only be resolved by recognizing t...

متن کامل

A Few Thoughts on Judicial Supremacy: a Response to Professors Carrington and Cramton

The efforts of Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and Stephen Breyer to provoke examination of the vitality of the American judiciary’s independence have inspired two conferences,1 which in turn have produced many thoughtful papers and much commentary. I have been asked to respond to one such paper offered by Professors Paul Carrington of Duke and Roger Cramton of Cornell.2 These two distinguished sc...

متن کامل

Interbranch Accountability in State Government and the Constitutional Requirement of Judicial Independence

When contemporary commentators decry what they describe as growing threats to “judicial independence,” they typically invoke “judicial independence” as a normative ideal—an institutional virtue. That virtue is the capacity of courts to protect individual rights, to police structural limits on governmental power, and to decide individual disputes based solely on the applicable law and the factua...

متن کامل

Fundamental Principles Regarding the Guarantee of the Principle of Judicial Impartiality in the International System and the Law of Iranian Law

The principles of independence and impartiality of the Judiciary is one of the most important grounds to achieve a fair trial and to ensure the rights of citizens in the proceedings, the principles which are inevitable for the existence of a judiciary whit fair and equitable judges. These principles have recognized in the vast majority of domestic legal systems as well as international legal re...

متن کامل

A Path to Purposive Formalism: Interpreting Chapter Iii for Judicial Independence and Impartiality

The interpretation of the separation of federal judicial power derived from Chapter III of the Constitution is as hotly debated as it is fundamentally important. Two key viewpoints have emerged in this debate, formalism and functionalism. A formalist test focusing on defi nitional characteristics governs the permissible powers of federal courts. A functionalist test looking to whether a power i...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2001